- Friday, March 2, 2018

release-team@conference.openafs.org

Friday, March 2, 2018< ^ >

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[05:31:55] mvita leaves the room
[11:59:20] Marcio Barbosa joins the room
[13:08:51] kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl leaves the room
[13:09:48] kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl joins the room
[13:59:59] wiesand joins the room
[14:00:27] <wiesand> Hello
[14:00:33] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> greetings
[14:00:48] <Marcio Barbosa> good morning
[14:00:51] mvita joins the room
[14:01:21] <mvita> hi
[14:01:26] <wiesand> My apologies for not having gotten anything done during the past week.
[14:01:42] meffie joins the room
[14:01:58] <meffie> good morning.
[14:02:08] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> You got one thing done -- not dying from the flu!
[14:02:31] <wiesand> I was a bit suspicious about gerrit re-adding all the +1s to the ubik changes after the reabse, and felt I have to convince myself that the rabaes wer in fact "trivial". And then I failed to find a slot for that.
[14:02:47] <wiesand> Yes, that too.
[14:03:12] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> In my experience gerrit does only reapply the +1s if it is truly
trivial, but of course experience is not a guarantee
[14:03:18] <wiesand> (I'm vaccinated, so its not supposed to kill me)
[14:03:32] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> (I see mvita also accomplished this, which is good)
[14:03:43] <wiesand> (yes)
[14:04:01] <mvita> but I did it sans vaccination
[14:04:30] <wiesand> Anyway, Marcio: could you check that the result of the rebases makes sense? That would probably be faster…
[14:04:42] <Marcio Barbosa> yes
[14:05:06] <wiesand> Thanks
[14:05:30] <wiesand> And then I'm felling a bit overwhelmed by some of the other things going on…
[14:05:40] <wiesand> in particular the recent rx changes
[14:06:04] <wiesand> and #134485
[14:08:27] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I don't think we need to take any action on #134485 at this meeting.
[14:08:49] <wiesand> Ok.
[14:09:07] <wiesand> But what about 12931, 12932?
[14:10:18] <wiesand> And of course I'm excited about 12935! Thanks Mark! (though it seems to need some polish)
[14:10:21] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I think they are mostly cosmetic, for the benfit of a human looking at
a packet capture
[14:10:53] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Yes, 12935 seems pretty clean and straightforward, thank you for
tracking it down!
[14:11:14] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I did not trust in the in-gerrit editor enough to make the ifdef-->if
changes for you, though.
[14:11:16] <mvita> i'm working on the next ps now
[14:13:32] <mvita> should I use #if (USE_FOP_ITERATE)
[14:13:48] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Parens are not needed, I think.
[14:13:49] <wiesand> And that's more or less what I have on 1.6 today
[14:13:53] <mvita> or #if (USE_FOP_ITERATE == 1)
[14:14:14] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I would just go with #if USE_FOP_ITERATE
[14:14:20] <mvita> okay
[14:14:59] <mvita> I chose not to set the stoopid f_mode flags because 1) stoopid and 2) unclear how to handle dynroot objects
[14:15:03] <wiesand> or #undef USE_FOP_ITERATE in the first hunk rather than defining it to 1?
[14:15:35] <wiesand> (but you're the wizards here…)
[14:16:11] <wiesand> (er, defining it to 0)
[14:16:59] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Ah, good point about dynroot objects
[14:17:43] <mvita> I thought my "stoopid" point was quite salient as well.
[14:17:58] <mvita> ;-)
[14:18:08] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> :)
[14:19:22] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I might have to run off again like last week, so let me drop a few
points out there...
[14:19:36] <wiesand> go ahead
[14:19:43] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> The issue with 1.8.0pre5 builds on debian was a regression in the flex
package and fixed itself, so that's still fine
[14:20:07] <wiesand> good
[14:20:13] <meffie> yay
[14:20:19] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I submitted 12934 that should fix the freebsd issue we got on the list
(it turns out the signedness issues were less widespread than I
thought)
[14:20:41] <wiesand> sounds good too
[14:20:46] <meffie> yay again
[14:20:49] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Mike or I or someone should tidy up the butc string handling thing a
bit more
[14:21:10] <meffie> ok, i'll take a look
[14:21:48] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I'll probably merge 12934 and 12924 later today unless people chime up
(e.g., to say the commit message for 12934 is silly)
[14:22:17] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I think I'm willing to put 12934 (for freebsd) into 1.8.0 without
another prerelease version
[14:23:04] <meffie> sound fine.
[14:23:08] <meffie> sounds
[14:23:22] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I've passed the editing token for rxgk changes to Andrew, so I can
reply to comments faster now (without worrying about replying to a
comment and then forgetting to address it).
[14:23:56] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Not much other progress from my end, though -- I want to look at the
vos zap and pthread conversion stuff, but have been busy.
[14:24:35] <meffie> great
[14:25:28] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I guess we did get that report on list with a corrupted vnode file on
the fileserver, but we have no data on how it happened or whether 1.8
as a server is suspect.
[14:26:12] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I guess I do still wonder whether we're happy just doing 12924 for the
issue that hartmut reported or of we want to do more. But it sounds
like it might be enough with just that
[14:26:34] <meffie> i think it is enough, as i understand it.
[14:26:45] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Anyway, looks like I'm out -- thanks everybody (and keep going with
the meeting if needed)
[14:27:01] <wiesand> Thanks a lot Ben.
[14:27:06] <meffie> thanks ben.
[14:27:53] <meffie> wiesand, can i report on buildbot updates?
[14:28:02] <wiesand> Sure
[14:28:37] <meffie> made some progress this improving the buildbot master configuration.
[14:29:32] <wiesand> what was changed?
[14:29:40] <meffie> we will now have a form on the buildbot.openafs.org that will allows users (with a username/password) to do builds
[14:29:55] <meffie> of arbitrary gerrits or branches on any builder
[14:30:13] <meffie> that includes doing builds on the "linux-rc" builders
[14:30:46] <wiesand> nice!
[14:31:05] <wiesand> how can I get an account?
[14:31:11] <meffie> so we can test commits and builders manually. i've made accounts for everyone here and will send emails
[14:31:26] <wiesand> great, thanks!
[14:31:35] <meffie> and send a mail to the release team list
[14:32:53] <meffie> also, i've setup the linux-rc builder to do 6 builds per day; the most recent linux rc and the ubuntu teams's daily linux snapshot for each branch: master, 1.8.x, and 1.6.x
[14:33:19] <mvita> wow
[14:33:22] <meffie> and i've added some more 1.6.x gerrit builders
[14:34:23] <meffie> next, i need to track down some issues with the builders we have, and then i'll be adding some more on sna's box.
[14:34:45] <wiesand> thanks for all that work!
[14:36:04] <meffie> you are welcome. in the future i hope to upgrade the master to the new 1.0 release and maybe then we can use kerberos for the buildbot logins.
[14:36:30] <wiesand> which realm would be used?
[14:37:42] <meffie> not sure, but i assume we'd want to use kerberos :)
[14:38:10] <meffie> the buildbot is running on the MIT site currently.
[14:38:52] <meffie> (i didnt mean to imply there are plans to move it )
[14:39:32] <meffie> for now, it's just using "basic auth" with a htpasswd file
[14:40:10] <meffie> fortunately ben had already setup TLS/SSL
[14:40:49] <wiesand> yes, good thing with basic auth…
[14:41:47] <wiesand> Anything else to discuss today?
[14:42:06] <mvita> nothing from me
[14:42:07] <wiesand> Mark: Thanks for PS3. Let's see whether buildbot is happy this time.
[14:42:13] <mvita> okay
[14:42:36] <meffie> just an apology for forgetting to post the meeting summary last week.
[14:43:23] <wiesand> well, as it would have embarrassed me, no problem… feel free to forget this week's again ;-)
[14:43:34] <wiesand> (just kidding, of course)
[14:43:42] <meffie> ha! ok.
[14:44:00] <meffie> have a good week end
[14:44:05] <mvita> so long
[14:44:51] <wiesand> I'm planning to spend at least a little bit of the weekend on 23pre1. Let's see…
[14:44:56] <wiesand> Thanks a lot everyone!
[14:45:09] wiesand leaves the room
[14:47:53] meffie leaves the room
[17:55:03] mvita leaves the room
[18:18:03] mvita joins the room
[18:29:15] mvita leaves the room
[18:29:16] mvita joins the room
[21:47:22] Marcio Barbosa leaves the room
[22:54:49] mvita leaves the room
[22:57:15] mvita joins the room
[23:35:12] mvita leaves the room
[23:35:13] mvita joins the room