- Wednesday, November 4, 2015

release-team@conference.openafs.org

Wednesday, November 4, 2015< ^ >

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[03:22:54] kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C leaves the room
[03:23:03] kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C joins the room
[04:21:21] mvita leaves the room
[11:29:02] shadow@gmail.com/barnowlABEE2063 joins the room
[12:27:06] shadow@gmail.com/barnowlABEE2063 leaves the room
[12:27:15] shadow@gmail.com/barnowlABEE2063 joins the room
[12:35:00] shadow@gmail.com/barnowlABEE2063 leaves the room
[12:35:12] shadow@gmail.com/barnowlABEE2063 joins the room
[12:52:48] shadow@gmail.com/barnowlABEE2063 leaves the room
[12:52:58] shadow@gmail.com/barnowlABEE2063 joins the room
[13:22:06] kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C leaves the room
[13:22:16] kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C joins the room
[13:34:21] kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C leaves the room
[13:34:30] kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C joins the room
[14:13:01] meffie joins the room
[14:18:04] mvita joins the room
[14:57:46] wiesand joins the room
[14:57:56] <wiesand> Hello
[14:58:09] <mvita> I'll be right there.
[14:59:47] <wiesand> peeking in the other room: we are broken for Linux 4.3?
[15:00:04] <mvita> okay, ready.
[15:00:13] <mvita> re: 4.3 - I haven't seen that yet
[15:01:27] <wiesand> Last time I had contact with Marc he didn’t expect us to be broken. That was around 4.3-rc5.
[15:01:59] <mvita> I remember that.
[15:02:32] <mvita> haven't seen any reports to the contrary (except kaduk's question last night)
[15:02:47] <wiesand> So is there any evidence that we are broken?
[15:03:12] <mvita> we'll have to ask Ben why he was asking.
[15:03:32] <wiesand> I’m just doing that ;-)
[15:03:51] <mvita> Carry on then.
[15:03:55] <mvita> ;-)
[15:04:28] <wiesand> Any bearer of news regarding Linux 4.4 around?
[15:06:08] <wiesand> I have no news saying that 1.6.16 can’t be a "normal" release.
[15:06:16] <meffie> yay
[15:07:30] <wiesand> I do see a cloud at the hoRTizon though...
[15:08:38] <mvita> looks like we could use a 4.x builder in our buildbot farm
[15:09:13] <mvita> RT? Oh. Heh.
[15:10:13] <wiesand> that builder would need to be updated weekly
[15:10:20] <mvita> yup
[15:11:33] <mvita> but probably could be automated
[15:12:38] <wiesand> And it would only catch build failures. I’m not sure that geurantess that the module will even load.
[15:13:46] <mvita> well - buildbot would have to have some new tests
[15:14:15] <wiesand> Things haven’t changed much lately. One open topic is still http://gerrit.openafs.org/#q,status:open+project:openafs+branch:openafs-stable-1_6_x+topic:volume-clone,n,z
[15:15:37] <mvita> looking
[15:16:03] <wiesand> Maybe it’s time to override that -1.
[15:16:30] <wiesand> 11825 could use another +1. The rebase wasn’t detected as a trivial one.
[15:16:59] <wiesand> 11826 should be good to go.
[15:17:44] <wiesand> so should 11436
[15:18:17] <wiesand> is 12056 stupid?
[15:18:51] <wiesand> 12077 is probably ok?
[15:19:17] <wiesand> 12078 too?
[15:19:51] <mvita> firefox tab fire
[15:19:59] <kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C> I was asking about Linux 4.3 since there was some slashdot thing about
it being released.
[15:20:14] <wiesand> That’s about what I see in gerrit-1.6.x that should make 1.6.16
[15:20:45] <wiesand> Ben: ok thanks. I was afraid you had heard a bug report.
[15:21:00] <meffie> til: people still read slashdot!
[15:21:42] <kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C> Someone set up a bot to pipe its rss feed to zephyr, so I am actually
reading zephyrgrams, not the slashdot website.
[15:22:14] <meffie> whew
[15:22:42] <mvita> 12056 - not stupid
[15:23:02] <kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C> 12056 is not stupid.
[15:23:42] <wiesand> Just thought so because it should be really easy to review but caught no attention...
[15:23:43] <meffie> +1 12056
[15:24:35] <wiesand> Mike: I havent’ forgotten about your list of candidates for 1.6.next (16?).
[15:25:03] <wiesand> Just haven’t checked for those "path conflicts" with the open changes yet.
[15:25:52] <meffie> thank you!
[15:25:54] <wiesand> So if you feel like pulling up, please check against the ones I mentioned earlier. Or wait until they’re out of the way.
[15:26:40] <meffie> ok, i will check then pull them up. thanks you.
[15:27:36] <meffie> kadukoafs, can you look at 12058 sometime?
[15:28:12] <meffie> some form of that is needed for a working libafs on master :(
[15:29:21] <wiesand> wasn’t that a regression due to 1001?
[15:29:39] <meffie> yes
[15:30:06] <meffie> (not on 1.6, just master)
[15:30:27] <wiesand> yes, that’s what I wanted to be sure about
[15:31:11] <meffie> (sorry i'm talking out of order, carry on)
[15:32:07] <wiesand> should CONTRIBUTING be packaged?
[15:33:27] <wiesand> Anything else regarding 1.6 to discuss today?
[15:33:47] <wiesand> If not, Ben, would you like to talk about 1.8?
[15:34:03] <kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C> I don't have anything prepared to talk about for 1.8.
[15:35:06] <wiesand> Anything else to discuss?
[15:35:44] <mvita> nothing from me.... I'm reviewing the gerrits you mentioned above
[15:35:59] <meffie> ben, the externalize-log-rotate patches have been rebased, and i addressed chas's comments.
[15:36:00] <wiesand> Thanks a lot.
[15:36:25] <kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C> Yes, thank you.
[15:36:33] <meffie> running them now in my test cell.
[15:37:06] <meffie> that's all i have.
[15:37:56] <wiesand> Fine. I think we’re done then?
[15:38:11] <kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C> Sounds like it.
[15:38:17] <kadukoafs@gmail.com/barnowl650AA74C> Thanks for playing
[15:38:39] <wiesand> Thanks a lot for being here today.
[15:38:50] <wiesand> Goodbye
[15:38:52] wiesand leaves the room
[15:39:00] <meffie> bye
[15:39:15] meffie leaves the room
[22:34:24] mvita leaves the room