- Tuesday, December 2, 2014

release-team@conference.openafs.org

Tuesday, December 2, 2014< ^ >

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[20:34:02] kaduk joins the room
[21:31:28] <kaduk> Query string like
Verified=1 status:open NOT CodeReview=-2 branch:master NOT message:windows
should be helpful
[21:31:40] <kaduk> (As much for my own benefit as anyone else's)
[21:35:57] <kaduk> This last page of changes I have to triage contains rxgk, pthreaad-bos, and a stack of windows changes.  Should go quickly :)
[21:36:20] <Jeffrey Altman> I hope you are simply ignoring the windows changes
[21:36:33] <kaduk> I am.
[21:36:54] <kaduk> Thank you for reliably putting the Windows: prefix in, it helps a lot.
[21:37:15] <Jeffrey Altman> that is what its for
[21:46:20] <Jeffrey Altman> Just to confirm.  These are the ones that you believe are ready for merging?
Verified=1 status:open CodeReview=2 branch:master NOT message:windows
[21:48:07] <kaduk> That looks plausible, but let me finish second lunch and actually look.
[21:50:27] <Jeffrey Altman> that sounds like my beagle.    he eats like a Hobbit.   breakfast, 2nd breakfast, 11s, lunch, 2nd lunch,  afternoon snack, 2nd afternoon snack, dinner, supper, evening snack, midnight snack
[21:51:58] <kaduk> Anders noted a nit or two in the mostly-build-sys topic that we may or may not care about
[21:53:08] <kaduk> I think there will still be some path conflicts on src/vol/namei_ops.c, so maybe 10213 should be merged last since that's only one change to rebase and I think there was a chain of several commits touching that file
[21:54:52] <kaduk> I think some of Andrew's rx changes that are found by that search are depending on earlier commits in the chain, and so can't actually be merged yet
[21:55:23] <kaduk> And some of his afs/ changes, for that matter
[21:56:44] <kaduk> 10326 has +2 from Daria but I -1'd because it's unsorted; I guess I should push a fixed version.
[21:59:39] <kaduk> There was a pthread-bos that had snuck in that list.
[21:59:39] <Jeffrey Altman> ok
[21:59:54] <kaduk> So, "yes, but read the last few comments/reviews as appropriate"
[22:18:19] <Jeffrey Altman> I will commit to reviewing that set tonight
[22:19:14] <kaduk> Thanks.
[23:01:45] <kaduk> Jeff, I'd also like to see if your opinion on 11324 has changed
[23:05:14] <Jeffrey Altman> let me pose the following question in response.  why is there Debian packaging in the tree if it is guaranteed to be out of date and there is a known public source of current Debian packaging from downstream?
[23:05:36] <kaduk> The same could be said of the freebsd packaging.
[23:05:41] <Jeffrey Altman> agreed
[23:05:46] <Jeffrey Altman> rip them both out
[23:06:09] <kaduk> Though, amusingly, the upstream freebsd packaging is currently referring to a file in src/packaging/FreeBSD (to get a list of manual pages, basically)
[23:07:07] <Jeffrey Altman> as the Debian packager I will defer to your wishes with regards to the packaging directory
[23:25:50] <kaduk> I will think about it ... later
[23:40:11] <kaduk> Time to figure out what dinner is.
Catch you later.
[23:40:16] kaduk leaves the room