[04:11:15] --- wiesand has become available [05:45:36] --- meffie has become available [06:27:18] --- Marc Dionne has become available [07:00:43] Hello [07:01:04] hi [07:01:10] hi stephan [07:02:14] Derrick, how's the Mavericks client doing? [07:03:48] --- squinney has become available [07:04:01] i'll have a patch later in the week to fix the panic. packaging still in the air [07:04:32] --- deason has become available [07:04:39] Ok. Let's try to get pre1 ready before that... [07:05:04] The cache truncation fixes have +1s from Derrick. [07:05:32] I can merge them like this, but: anyone who feels there should be more review of them? [07:06:00] probably [07:06:21] So, anyone who feels like doing ti? [07:06:51] when do you want it by? [07:07:39] Well, I created the 1.6.6pre1 volume on grnad.central.org a week ago, and was hoping to need it soon. [07:08:28] If we don't do pre1 really soon, we'll run into the holiday season [07:08:55] And there are fixes in there we should get out [07:10:23] The second open topic is 10428: [07:10:41] I'd really much rather merge this together with a pullup of 10443. [07:10:55] btw, in the us, the week after next is thanksgiving. [07:11:23] Ah, thanks for the heads up. [07:11:30] yes i would take both, although in theory the typo in the first commit is in code that should never compile [07:12:08] Marc: yes. But there's a bug, and dead code, and even though they cancel each other, it's just ugly. [07:12:52] Derrick: any chance you could look at 10443? [07:13:09] so take both, agreed that it's better that leaving a typo [07:13:41] But we need it merged on master before we can pull it up... [07:15:02] The last one I think could go into 1.6.6pre1 is 10454 . [07:16:44] looks low risk, failure path only [07:16:51] yep [07:17:12] but probably not urgent to have it in [07:17:16] is the osi_Free supposed to be outside the #if ? [07:18:44] probably, it's allocated even in the non BDI_INIT case [07:19:15] Derrick: thanks. Wondering why it didn't merge... [07:19:20] ah, yes. [07:19:24] It is allocated at line 115 outside of the HAVE_LINUX_BDI_INIT conditional [07:19:37] yeah, it's still used if bdi_init doesn't exist [07:21:59] Ah, path conflict is due to the bdi_destroy change. [07:24:41] I'll rebase it later. [07:25:23] if someone can rebase 10443 easily, please do. i have a dirty sandbox atm. [07:26:01] working on it [07:27:51] ok. disentangling the sandbox or git stash with built products i don't want to lose seem poor [07:28:12] It's up there, and gerrit thinks it's a trivial rebase. [07:28:30] ok. once it verifies i will push [07:28:54] Thanks. [07:29:34] What are current thoughts on 10444? [07:30:03] I believe we had the problem described a couple of times. [07:30:22] No idea how to reproduce it though, and it's not frequent. [07:30:27] it looks probably correct to me, but not clear that it solves the problem [07:32:06] i'd like to see if chas ends up developing a proposal, because i think he has the right idea [07:32:26] I just merged 10454. Thanks. [07:33:12] 10359 has a new draft for the release notes. [07:34:12] It already includes what I expected to go in (everything discussed but 10444). [07:35:19] So, I guess everything is underway for pre1. [07:35:51] Anything else to discuss today? [07:36:02] do you have an estimated timeline in mind for pre1? [07:36:52] yes: a.s.a.p. [07:37:07] Seriously though: [07:38:02] Once the cache truncation fixes and 10428 have been merged, I'd create tarballs pretty much immediately. [07:38:23] Smoke tests by release-team, then ask Derrick for the tag. [07:38:33] works for me [07:39:06] --- meffie has left [07:39:21] --- meffie has become available [07:39:37] So it really depends on the missing review and progress on the 10443 pullup (which is a very minor obstacle I think) [07:40:51] okay [07:41:39] just fyi, I won't be able to be here for a meeting next week [07:42:14] Thanks. If things go as planned, we'll be waiting for pre1 test reports then... [07:42:24] that would be good [07:43:04] I think we should announce once we have the tarballs. Binaries can be added later. [07:43:25] (tarballs and the tag, of course) [07:44:11] So, any other topics for today? [07:46:07] I think we are good [07:46:39] Ok. Thanks a lot everyone. [07:47:16] thank you [07:55:04] Buildbot just verified 10443. [08:17:57] --- meffie has left [08:17:58] --- meffie has become available [08:20:25] didn't come up earlier but fyi we're still good with current kernel git, after the bulk of the vfs changes for 3.13 [08:20:54] Good news. [08:23:12] Sigh. Both 10427 and 10428 have the Change-ID problem :-( [08:29:16] abandon and resubmit with a new change-id [08:32:24] seems like gerrit could have an option to reject a change-id it has seen on a different branch [08:32:43] http://gerrit.openafs.org/#q,status:open+project:openafs+branch:openafs-stable-1_6_x+topic:linux-user-ns,n,z [08:33:01] Will ask Anders to abandon... [08:41:15] Thanks for the +1s Marc. [09:04:23] --- Marc Dionne has left [09:16:30] --- meffie has left [09:52:39] --- wiesand has left [11:45:31] --- deason has left [11:53:25] --- deason has become available [13:42:15] --- squinney has left [13:46:59] --- squinney has become available [15:25:39] --- deason has left [15:25:40] --- deason has become available [15:37:18] --- deason has left [17:50:30] --- squinney has left [17:51:04] --- squinney has become available [23:17:45] --- squinney has left [23:19:09] --- squinney has become available