[00:19:22] --- Derrick Brashear has become available [04:07:48] --- Marc Dionne has become available [05:39:46] --- squinney has become available [06:57:42] --- meffie has become available [06:58:39] --- Stephan Wiesand has become available [06:59:12] morning/afternoon [06:59:49] Hello [07:01:18] --- deason/gmail has become available [07:01:25] mornin' [07:02:20] I hope this will be a brief one. [07:02:47] thank you for pointing out the location of the logs. [07:03:38] Well, it's in the minutes too - when I get around to writing them. Sorry. High priority local project, users waiting,... [07:04:22] But from my point of view, we're ready for 1.6.3pre1. [07:04:47] Any different opinions? [07:05:10] Not from here [07:05:33] i see no issues [07:05:55] Has anyone smoke tested the current HEAD of 1_6_x? [07:06:23] i havent, recently. [07:07:21] over the weekend. tho i'd have to confirm that was actually current [07:07:55] It wasn't. [07:08:03] I ran whatever the "ihsync options" commit was based on [07:09:52] looking through... 9692 maybe would've been nice, but I guess it's not terribly important [07:10:54] I'd rather not change Makefiles at this point... [07:11:49] But I listen to the experts of course... so if you all think it's 0 risk, fine. [07:12:04] With or without 9692, I'd propose the following: [07:12:18] 9692 is boring enough you shoudl take it [07:12:44] also only affects non-critical afsio [07:13:58] We merge 9858 and 9859, and I upload pre1 tarballs to g.c.o. [07:14:25] And after smoke testing by release-team, we tag it. [07:15:06] Sounds like a plan [07:15:56] that might be sort of confusing, because 9858 says make pre1, but the tag would be on a different commit. [07:17:09] I'd actually merge 59 first. [07:17:14] eh, a lot of (most?) the other releases are like that [07:17:37] But it probably doesn't really matter. [07:17:55] If our smoke tests reveal a problem, it will be like this anyway. [07:18:02] oh. then i retract :) i'm already confused. [07:18:47] If anyone thinks merging 9692 is a bad idea, please speak up. [07:19:28] i think it is ok. [07:19:48] Chas Williams seems to be interested in 9605. [07:20:16] Looks harmless to, but I'm really afraid of introducing a subtle build problem at this point. [07:23:01] [just merged 9692] [07:23:10] it only seems to affect ppc linux, and uafs; I wouldn't be bothered by it [07:24:19] the solaris 64 bit builds needs some of those same hunks as 9605, so we can target that at the same time? [07:24:40] 9605 is fine here also [07:26:34] or, if you take 9605 now, that would be fine too, that is just ppc linux specific for now. [07:26:48] --- ktdreyer has become available [07:26:57] Could someone briefly look at 9858? [07:27:43] the version update? [07:27:44] solaris64 isn't as important as ppclinux 64; solaris can wait, as the platform still works [07:28:56] [just merged 9605] [07:29:26] Derrick: yes, the version update. I'm doing those rather mechanically. [07:31:18] why would the spec file need updating? [07:31:38] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [07:32:15] --- Simon Wilkinson has left [07:32:31] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [07:33:35] I think makesrpm rewrites the spec file. [07:34:12] My understanding was that the packaging checked into the tree was purely advisory and not necessarily up-to-date. [07:34:28] well, we didn't update the spec in any other 1.6.x pre, so, fine. [07:34:31] That's not true for Fedora [07:34:54] For Fedora and RHEL, the canonical spec file is the one in the tree. And makesrpm takes care of putting the right version into it. [07:35:22] Okay, then. [07:36:21] Of course, it's a round about now that we tend to discover that there's stuff missing from the spec file, and have to respin a pre to fix it [07:37:09] But this doesn't require a tag, does it? [07:37:24] not exactly.you can cheat with a .version file [07:38:33] WIthout a .version file, you should still get a usable name. [07:39:01] (You'll get something based on the previous release name, with the number of commits since that release used to provide more detail, iirc) [07:40:15] squinney: if you're busy today, I can try a smokebuild of the .spec file just to ensure that all the files are properly listed, so we don't have to re-tag just for RPMs. When were you guys hoping to push the tag and announce? [07:41:46] After some positive and no negative feedback from release-team. [07:42:00] So, "it depends" [07:42:20] --- Simon Wilkinson has left [07:45:41] Monday, probably. With lots of "works great for me", maybe Friday. [07:48:04] Seems like I can go ahead, and we should have preliminary 1.6.3pre1 tarballs on grand.central.org later today? [07:48:20] go ahead [07:48:57] Ok, will do. Anything else you'd like to discuss today? [07:50:36] It seems no. Fine. Thanks a lot everyone! [07:52:34] thank you Stephan [07:52:56] --- Marc Dionne has left [07:53:17] --- Stephan Wiesand has left [07:57:33] --- meffie has left [08:19:12] ktdreyer: sorry, had to pop out, if you have time that would be excellent [08:19:20] I won't have time to do that until tomorrow [08:23:52] no prob I'm building it now :) [08:29:23] --- squinney has left [08:31:29] it works! [08:31:48] mocked openafs-1.6.3-0.pre1.src.rpm on F17 [08:35:14] --- Derrick Brashear has left [09:17:48] --- kaduk@mit.edu/barnowl has left [09:18:59] --- kaduk@mit.edu/barnowl has become available [10:19:39] --- Jeffrey Altman has left: Disconnected [10:22:39] --- Jeffrey Altman has become available [11:27:25] --- stephan.wiesand has become available [12:45:02] --- stephan.wiesand has left [15:16:09] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [15:22:33] --- Simon Wilkinson has left [15:22:57] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [15:37:40] --- Simon Wilkinson has left [15:38:44] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [15:42:02] --- Simon Wilkinson has left [15:42:52] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [16:14:21] --- deason/gmail has left [16:17:43] --- Simon Wilkinson has left [17:05:35] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [17:18:43] --- Simon Wilkinson has left