- Thursday, February 26, 2015

openafs@conference.openafs.org

Thursday, February 26, 2015< ^ >

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[00:09:37] kaduk leaves the room
[00:46:32] ballbery leaves the room
[00:47:19] ballbery joins the room
[00:54:49] ballbery leaves the room
[00:58:20] ballbery joins the room
[02:09:49] ballbery leaves the room
[02:10:24] ballbery joins the room
[03:17:43] ballbery leaves the room
[03:56:20] ballbery joins the room
[08:15:47] Jeffrey Altman leaves the room
[09:48:39] Simon Wilkinson joins the room
[09:48:50] Simon Wilkinson leaves the room
[09:50:01] Simon Wilkinson joins the room
[11:04:46] Simon Wilkinson joins the room
[11:05:02] Simon Wilkinson leaves the room
[13:33:45] meffie joins the room
[13:55:21] wiesand joins the room
[13:59:42] Jeffrey Altman joins the room
[14:51:41] ballbery leaves the room
[14:51:41] ballbery joins the room
[15:23:04] wiesand leaves the room
[15:33:03] kaduk joins the room
[16:15:52] ballbery leaves the room
[16:16:08] ballbery joins the room
[16:36:08] meffie leaves the room
[16:53:03] Simon Wilkinson leaves the room
[17:36:48] meffie joins the room
[21:23:10] <kaduk> Hmm, are the suse builders actually having trouble talking to the git repo, or am I misreading things?
[21:23:45] <kaduk> Well, a review just came in, so maybe things are just plugging away.
[21:31:29] <meffie> i've seen at least 2 git fails on suse builders lately.
[21:32:15] <kaduk> I was just doing a check in gerrit of things that were NOT verified=1, and several things came up that should be okay, so I went looking. (Normally my dashboard search excludes unverified changes.)
[21:42:11] <kaduk> Thanks for the review of 9985 -- that's a long one to get through.
[21:45:03] <meffie> 9985 would look good to a blind man.
[21:45:51] <kaduk> I think I should start from the end the next time I look at it; I was probably getting sloppy by the end of it.
[21:52:40] <meffie> should i rebase all the log stuff on top of it now, or wait till it hits master?
[21:58:11] <kaduk> I don't think it really matters very much. If you have to push a new version of the log stuff anyway, you might as well rebase on top of 9985, but there's no need to do the rebase now just for the sake of doing the rebase.
[21:58:57] <meffie> ok
[22:23:29] <Jeffrey Altman> don't bother rebasing on top of 9985 since it needs to be revised
[22:41:18] <kaduk> (I hadn't seen the -1 on 9985 until Jeff's message here)
[23:16:07] kaduk leaves the room
[23:24:43] meffie leaves the room