- Friday, January 9, 2015

openafs@conference.openafs.org

Friday, January 9, 2015< ^ >

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[03:59:47] mvita joins the room
[05:12:03] mvita leaves the room
[10:20:06] Simon Wilkinson leaves the room
[10:20:42] Simon Wilkinson joins the room
[10:29:11] Simon Wilkinson leaves the room
[12:56:56] ballbery leaves the room
[13:36:16] ballbery joins the room
[14:50:58] mvita joins the room
[15:54:24] kaduk joins the room
[19:03:07] <kaduk> I pushed a new version of the MTU/packetsize series with better commit messages.
[19:06:49] <kaduk> I wonder if explicitly sending deason mail (as opposed to letting gerrit send it) is more likely to result in -1s being removed.
[19:41:27] <kaduk> jhutz, Andrew has this inline comment in your gerrit 10713 that I'd really like to see a response to before doing anything with the change
[19:42:30] <mvita> kaduk - I can ping deason about that right now
[19:43:47] <mvita> *done*
[19:43:54] <kaduk> mvita: thanks.  I think there were two that I had run across today so far; 11615 is one of them, but I'm not finding the other one right away
[19:44:10] <kaduk> But, Andrew should have mail with the numbers in question, so it's probably moot :)
[19:56:02] <Jeffrey Altman> the aix builder has been offline for a week.   e-mails to Niklas have not been returned.
[19:56:31] <kaduk> Sounds like it's time to ask Jason to remove it from the pool (temporarily), then.
[20:01:32] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> The line in question is correct.  The expected output is the number of
values that have been filled in, not the number of 32-bit integers that
fit in a struct fid.
[20:07:29] <kaduk> Thanks.  I guess I should take a closer look, then.
[20:14:19] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> It is, arguably, a separate change.  But not worth the effort IMHO.
[20:16:57] <kaduk> Ah.  Thanks for commenting.
[20:19:42] mvita leaves the room
[20:19:55] mvita joins the room
[20:23:12] Perry Ruiter joins the room
[21:15:46] <kaduk> Hmm, jhutz, should I just make the change to "goto out;" style in gerrit 9985, or should I hold out for you to do so?
[21:18:34] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> let me look...
[21:20:28] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> It doesn't look like I've done that and just not uploaded it.
So by all means, go for it.
[21:21:05] <kaduk> Okay.
[21:21:29] <kaduk> I'm trying to get the stuff that is -1 reviewd and not -2 reviewed down to things that we can ignore for the purposes of 1.8
[21:31:40] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> Oh, I see.
[21:32:09] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> Well, there's a change that depends on that one which should probably
be merged at the same time.
[21:32:46] <kaduk> "gerrit doesn't see the dependency"
[21:32:54] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> ...?
[21:33:19] <kaduk> The "Dependencies" section finds only an abandoned change, 9977
[21:33:39] <kaduk> Which I claimed was superseded by 11453.
[21:36:58] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> Right, except it's not, exactly.
Sure, 11453 is a different way of doing the same thing as 9977.
Which is fine, but 9977 depended on 9985 so that making the buffers
bigger wouldn't result in exploding stack sizes.
[21:37:41] <jhutz@jis.mit.edu/owl> IOW, I don't think 11453 should have been merged before 9985 either.
[21:37:47] <kaduk> I see that.
[21:38:28] <kaduk> "But I wanted to build a debian package so that lintian and friends could tell me what else was broken about master"
[21:53:11] <kaduk> Hmm, did I fail to build-test that long chain before pushing?  I thought I built it...
[21:53:39] ballbery leaves the room
[21:58:45] <kaduk> Apparently I only built the other change.  Sigh.
[22:03:56] ballbery joins the room
[22:05:30] ballbery leaves the room
[22:05:36] ballbery joins the room
[22:30:27] kaduk leaves the room