- Monday, July 21, 2014

openafs@conference.openafs.org

Monday, July 21, 2014< ^ >

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[00:20:49] ballbery leaves the room
[00:30:40] ballbery joins the room
[00:40:21] ballbery leaves the room
[00:49:17] mvita joins the room
[01:48:30] mvita leaves the room
[02:16:57] mvita joins the room
[02:52:24] ballbery joins the room
[03:42:37] mvita leaves the room
[13:39:31] mvita joins the room
[14:46:12] kaduk joins the room
[15:02:38] Jeffrey Altman leaves the room
[15:02:45] Jeffrey Altman joins the room
[15:09:26] deason joins the room
[15:13:34] Jeffrey Altman leaves the room
[15:20:20] Jeffrey Altman joins the room
[18:24:50] Jeffrey Altman leaves the room
[18:24:50] Jeffrey Altman joins the room
[20:44:32] kaduk leaves the room
[21:17:50] kaduk joins the room
[21:23:26] deason leaves the room
[21:23:26] deason joins the room
[21:48:39] <kaduk> Does anyone know offhand if we support build configurations whose compilers do not respect the C99 semantics that global variables are initialized to zeros/NULLs? (I am looking at things like the rxkad_stats structures, where we use an incomplete initializer at the moment. I'm running with a warning/error-heavy set of compiler flags, which complains about such incomplete initializers.)
[21:48:39] wiesand leaves the room
[22:38:30] <deason> a lot of things would break if the compiler doesn't initialize global/static vars to 0
[22:44:20] <kaduk> Hmm, apparently this particular explicit initializer was added in macos-build-update-20040310 (7e1b1a2e)
[22:45:54] <kaduk> I feel like darwin is providing a very different compiler today than it did ten years ago...
[22:49:03] kaduk leaves the room
[23:09:24] Jeffrey Altman leaves the room
[23:44:18] Jeffrey Altman joins the room