- Monday, June 2, 2014

openafs@conference.openafs.org

Monday, June 2, 2014< ^ >

Room Configuration

Room Occupants

GMT+0
[13:15:08] mvita joins the room
[14:10:36] meffie joins the room
[14:11:48] meffie leaves the room
[14:20:37] deason joins the room
[14:22:19] deason leaves the room
[14:22:20] deason joins the room
[14:22:35] <ballbery> http://dl.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.6.8/fedora-19/x86_64/openafs-docs-1.6.8-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download. Suggestion: run yum --enablerepo=openafs clean metadata
(repeat for all installable packages in 1.6.8 fedora19 repo)
[14:23:02] <ballbery> cleaned metadata, doesn't help. manually downloaded package's rpm header looks sane to me
[14:30:24] <deason> ballbery: I've mentioned it to stephan; the yum metadata (specifically package length) is wrong
[14:42:33] <ballbery> ok
[16:55:42] kaduk joins the room
[16:57:21] <kaduk> Are we still looking for review on the 1.6 coverity patches?
[16:58:25] <deason> until they're merged, yeah
[16:58:53] <kaduk> Okay. Thanks.
[16:59:39] <deason> but of course 'best' ones to look at are the ones with fewest reviews
[17:00:32] <kaduk> Is that a searchable attribute?
[17:01:28] <deason> no, not in a useful way for this, I don't think
[17:01:39] <deason> but if you grab the tool from here: http://gerrit.openafs.org/#change,10168 you can get changes by # of reviews
[17:06:28] <kaduk> On the other hand, if I review from the start of the stack, then the mergeable commits are the ones with the most reviews.
[17:08:56] <deason> yes, that too
[18:28:33] <kaduk> Hmm, Stephan is giving me review requests ... maybe I should rethink my strategy :)
[20:18:22] deason leaves the room
[20:18:23] deason joins the room
[22:18:28] kaduk leaves the room
[22:40:24] deason leaves the room