[09:51:12] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Ah, this is why gerrit is confusing me:
* 6456b9d bozo: pthread locking for bnodes list
| * f9806c9 bozo: Split thread creation into bnode_InitProcs()
| * 996d5b8 bozo: handle signals directly instead of using softsig
| * 560fbae bozo: add build support for pthreaded bosserver
| * 68f235c Export functions for libtoolized bozo
| * ada4a9e bozo: pthread locking for bnodes list
|/  
* f3acd1b bozo: add pthread support for sleeping on a bnode
* 7d8b144 bozo: update delete flag only in Bnode_Delete()
* 39c2d7f bozo: protect the allProcs list with a lock
* 96c0ff9 bozo: initial pthread support
| * a161bdb bozo: initial pthread support
|/  
* f5f53cb Linux: afs_fill_super: Call bdi_destroy on the failure path
[10:14:13] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I am, however, extremely confused at how gerrit knows about 39c2d7f
but does not appear to know about 96c0ff9.
[10:16:52] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I guess the two differ only by committer, but it still seems odd.
[11:33:21] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Almost frustrated enough to go through and fix compile_et so parallel
builds aren't broken.
Except, wait, Andrew already did that and it just needs review!
[11:35:22] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Excuse me, that was Mike, not Andrew.
[11:37:02] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Hmm, but the gerrit change depends on 10362 which I wasn't sure about.
[12:08:28] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Am I actually just confused in 7921?
[12:13:15] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Oops, figured it out.
[12:15:23] --- mvita has left
[12:15:36] --- mvita has become available
[12:23:08] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I guess I am just confused, today.
[12:23:41] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Can I cancel pending buildbot builds?
[12:36:10] --- Marc Dionne has become available
[13:25:52] --- meffie has become available
[13:31:00] <meffie> kaduk, the stuff in gerrit fixes the issues i've found by trail-and-error, the bulk of it is the missing/wrong dependencies. i have something to push soon that shows inter-package depends, so i can audit those. (generated a graphviz of the package dependencies)
[13:37:48] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> I'm sure it's a big improvement.
[13:38:10] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> What are your thoughts on the rxgk document's progression?
[13:45:17] <meffie> i didnt realize there was going to be a -09. i hope it is that last rev, since the bulk of the nego description was move to the kitten wg?
[13:46:01] <kaduk@jabber.openafs.org/barnowl> Yeah, the discussion was moved there.  In retrospect, the -09 may not
have even been necessary.
[13:49:37] <meffie> i guess the main thing, from my point of view, i still think a good thing to do is to a get a nod from simon, since he was the original author (and has the subject matter expertise).
[14:43:37] --- meffie has left
[14:43:38] --- meffie has become available
[15:03:22] --- mvita has left
[15:13:21] --- meffie has left
[15:25:47] --- mvita has become available
[15:38:01] --- mvita has left
[19:21:44] --- ballbery has left