[00:06:55] --- Russ has left: Disconnected [00:24:24] --- lars.malinowsky has become available [05:42:51] --- matt has left [06:19:32] --- reuteras has left [07:08:28] --- deason_gmail has become available [08:00:44] --- lars.malinowsky has left [09:05:13] --- rra has become available [09:27:43] --- lars.malinowsky has become available [09:36:32] Ah, it looks like the final release of Linux 3.0 is going to be called 3.0, not 3.0.0, as well. We should be sure we can deal with two-component version numbers. [09:55:53] --- lars.malinowsky has left [09:56:19] --- lars.malinowsky has become available [11:50:35] The problem with using the LSB version is that it looks like at present, at least to a first approximation, no one cares about LSB. No one seems to be doing the work to maintain it in a reasonable way, and almost no one seems to be using it for its intended purpose. [11:52:44] --- jakllsch has become available [11:54:14] --- jakllsch has left [11:54:24] --- jakllsch/siwenna has become available [12:08:58] --- matt has become available [12:37:21] --- jwelsh has become available [13:15:14] --- mfelliott has left [13:41:13] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [13:42:43] --- jwelsh has left [13:59:50] will I be sad if I move a vice partition from sparc to x86 with namei? [14:02:01] one way to find out :-P [14:02:17] I think you _shouldn't_ be. But I have a nagging suspicion that we may have had some bugs there in the past [14:02:29] Safe way is with vos move, but I'm guessing you don't have the storage to do that. [14:03:08] I need the HBAs out of the machine that currently accesses that storage for the new machine [14:04:02] Try asking on openafs-info. Failing that, try it with a test volume. [14:04:20] I could juggle some things though to make a vos move possible, but easies would be to just re-cable and changeloc [14:04:42] it's certainly supposed to work; I'm not aware of anything in practice that makes it not work [14:05:09] what's the worst case if it doesn't work? [14:06:53] volume needs salvaging / goes offline, maybe? hard to imagine losing any actual file data, since a file is just a blob [14:07:20] Yeah. The only thing I can think of that might go wrong is if some metadata goes screwy. [14:07:39] I'd actually be more scared of doing this with demand attach, than with the old fileserver, just because there is more metadata. [14:07:54] this will be 1.4.14 [14:08:14] "more metadata"? not on /vicepX [14:08:52] I think I'll go the safe route and make arrangements for vos move. 4TB of data in question here. [14:08:55] Ah yeah, and I guess you'll just be moving over the /vicepX parititions [15:09:38] --- lars.malinowsky has left [15:11:15] --- lars.malinowsky has become available [15:48:36] --- deason_gmail has left [16:48:56] --- matt has left [17:26:47] --- rra has left: Disconnected [17:49:28] --- Russ has become available [23:43:56] --- reuteras has become available