[00:36:07] --- Russ has left: Disconnected [00:38:41] --- lars.malinowsky has become available [05:08:15] --- lars.malinowsky has left [07:17:09] --- reuteras has left [07:26:50] --- deason_gmail has become available [08:05:49] --- deason_gmail has left [08:07:23] --- lars.malinowsky has become available [08:10:18] --- deason_gmail has become available [09:52:15] --- jaltman/FrogsLeap has left: Disconnected [10:21:32] --- Russ has become available [11:13:48] Hm, the next release of Linux is going to be 3.0. I suspect that's going to confuse a lot of our configure mechanics. It sounds like we shouldn't allocate a new sysname, since there are no major changes. [13:40:14] --- jaltman/FrogsLeap has become available [14:44:19] Do we know if we're waiting on anything to release sw.openafs.rc -c g.c.o ? [14:45:25] Possibly relatedly, apparently we don't build (or maybe install?) kdump on i386_fbsd_{90, but presumably *}, which changed between pre3 and pre5 (and I haven't tested pre6). [17:06:18] --- Russ has left: Disconnected [17:13:51] --- Russ has become available [17:27:17] --- mdionne has become available [17:41:35] make[3]: *** No rule to make target `param.amd64_linux30.h', needed by `/s/openafs/git/include/afs/param.h'. Stop. [17:49:45] funny thing is, without the version change this was lining up to be a patch-free linux release for openafs [17:53:40] Yeah. *heh* [17:53:52] It should be a fairly simple configure change, though. [18:31:19] yes pretty straightforward. I have it going now using amd64_linux30. the question is whether we want to introduce new 30 sysnames at this point or not [18:31:46] I'd say not. There isn't really any difference that warrants a sysname bump. [18:31:56] Although I suppose it would let us drop a bunch of compat code. [18:32:08] If we split off LINUX from LINUX26. [18:43:36] major new features are rare these days, so it may be a while before some new feature warrants a sysname bump. it would seem cleaner to me to do it along with the kernel version [18:46:21] Yeah, that's probably a good idea. [18:46:42] --- matt has become available [18:57:46] seems too early to split off LINUX26. it would add some maintenance effort at this point without too much gain. maybe once the bulk of systems have moved over to 3.x [18:59:32] --- mdionne has left [22:31:56] --- deason_gmail has left [23:40:25] --- reuteras has become available [23:47:21] --- lars.malinowsky has left [23:57:56] i'd rather have the lsb version in @sys, that's the best approximation there is of a version number for all the various abis...