[00:35:33] --- Russ has left: Disconnected [04:59:33] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [07:18:17] --- deason has become available [07:21:01] --- steven.jenkins has left [07:23:48] --- steven.jenkins has become available [07:46:28] --- jaltman has left: Disconnected [07:56:40] --- Simon Wilkinson has left [08:52:11] --- Russ has become available [08:57:42] so if we force rx timeouts to have certain relationships to each other... is there a preference on if we just ignore attempts to set timeouts to "invalid" values, or if we adjust the other timeouts to accomodate? [08:59:00] for some reason I want to do the latter for deadtime (needs to stay the smallest) and the former for idle/hard; I don't know why, and maybe it's not a good idea [08:59:11] --- jaltman has become available [09:16:56] --- jaltman has left: Disconnected [09:17:05] --- jaltman has become available [09:20:06] --- shadow@gmail.com/owlB905A33D has left [09:21:31] --- shadow@gmail.com/owlB905A33D has become available [09:43:06] --- jaltman has left: Disconnected [11:26:58] --- jaltman has become available [11:30:34] --- jaltman has left: Disconnected [11:30:38] --- jaltman has become available [11:54:11] --- jaltman has left: Disconnected [15:47:46] --- deason has left [20:02:29] --- jaltman has become available [20:35:11] --- Simon Wilkinson has become available [23:58:12] --- Russ has left: Disconnected