[01:27:28] --- Russ has left: Disconnected
[05:27:30] --- Jeffrey Altman has left: Replaced by new connection
[07:06:41] --- cg2v has become available
[07:09:04] --- cg2v has left
[07:21:15] --- Jeffrey Altman has become available
[07:24:40] --- cclausen has become available
[07:35:45] <Simon Wilkinson> There's quite a few places where the person tagging a release hasn't done a cvs update -d before applying the tag, so entire directories are missing from the CVS tag, which are there if you apply the changesets in order.
[07:36:07] <Simon Wilkinson> My proposal is to just leave these directories in git - I can't see any situations in which having _more_ files in a tag than less will cause any harm.
[10:06:05] --- cclausen has left
[10:20:00] <shadow@gmail.com/owl72BABB76> > There's quite a few places where the person tagging a release
[10:20:01] <shadow@gmail.com/owl72BABB76> guilty
[10:20:13] --- cclausen has become available
[10:21:22] <Simon Wilkinson> CVS also has some very funky behaviour if you only branch part of the tree. The part you've branched is on a branch, and the rest of the tree tracks wherever you branched from. Needless to say, git doesn't really have that behaviour ...
[10:21:57] <shadow@gmail.com/owl72BABB76> good.
[10:22:00] <shadow@gmail.com/owl72BABB76> (for git)
[10:22:51] <Simon Wilkinson> We're going to have to lose 'openafs-rxkad-krb5-lha' - there's pretty much no way to reconstruct it, without pulling a load of deltas up to that branch.
[10:27:08] <shadow@gmail.com/owl72BABB76> byebye then
[12:09:26] --- Russ has become available
[13:47:53] --- matt has become available
[13:55:26] --- edgester has become available
[17:36:17] --- matt has left
[20:24:01] --- edgester has left
[21:20:20] --- cclausen has left
[22:07:59] --- cclausen has become available